Opposition lambasts climate plans as parliamentary process kicks off
Germany鈥檚 opposition parties used the first debate on key legislation for the government's climate package to criticise the Climate Action Law and the Climate Action Programme 2030, which aim to bring Germany back on track to reach its 2030 targets.
Oliver Krischer, deputy head of the Greens鈥� parliamentary group, said the climate package could reach a third of targeted national emissions reductions at best, and in no way the goals of the Paris Agreement. It would not deliver on key issues such as the reduction of climate-harmful subsidies, and the necessary expansion of renewable energies. Krischer said he hoped at least some details of the package could be changed in the parliamentary process.
Frank Sitta, deputy parliamentary group head of the pro-business Free Democrats, criticised the planned speedy process the government aims to have in parliament now. Instead of taking time to seek a climate consensus with other parties 鈥� as was originally proposed by CDU party head Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer 鈥� the government 鈥渋s chasing the result of its inner-coalition quarrels head over heels through the parliament.鈥� Sitta also criticised the planned CO2 emissions trading system for transport and buildings. Due to the fixed prices in the early years it would be a 鈥渃arbon tax in disguise without any steering effect鈥�.
The policy package contains crucial measures such as introducing a price on carbon emissions in the transport and buildings sector, but from the onset has also been criticised for lacking ambition and being insufficient to meet climate targets. To implement the proposals, multiple laws have to be introduced or amended in parliament over the coming months.聽
Thus, today鈥檚 debate kicks off what looks to be a months-long legislative process. The parliament (Bundestag) has to adopt the necessary laws to implement the climate package, and there will be different timelines for the individual policy elements. In some cases, the council of state governments (Bundesrat) must also agree, which could demand additional time. The coalition plans to have final decisions on many of the pieces before the year is out.
The Left Party鈥檚 Gesine L枚tzsch said the climate package lacked social fairness. She highlighted that the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) and the German Court of Auditors聽had criticised聽that the plans put lower-income households at a disadvantage. 鈥淪o far, you have dealt with every crisis at the expense of the lower and middle class,鈥� L枚tzsch told government representatives present in parliament, using the rescue packages during the financial crisis as an example.
The far-right populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) criticised the plans for their costs and reitarated its denial of the human influence on the climate.
Climate package will be 鈥渓ove at second sight鈥� - finance minister
The government coalition defended the package. Environment minister Svenja Schulze (SPD) called the decisions the 鈥渂iggest climate action package Germany has ever seen鈥�. Alluding to the legislative process kicked off today, she said: 鈥淲e have a work-intensive autumn ahead of us.鈥�
Finance minister Olaf Scholz (SPD) said the government would present more and more legislative proposals to implement the package. Despite recent criticism, Scholz said he expects parliamentarians to come around in the upcoming debates. The government plans would be 鈥渓ove at second sight鈥�.
Andreas Jung (CDU), deputy head of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group, said that with the climate action law, Germany鈥檚 targets 鈥� which have so far been a government policy programme 鈥� would now be made legally binding, namely the 2030 target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55 percent, and the long-term target to become climate-neutral by 2050. 鈥淭hus, we want to make our climate policy part of the success of the climate action of the European Union,鈥� said Jung.
Another CDU/CSU deputy parliamentary group head, Georg N眉脽lein (CSU), said that climate change could not be tackled through changes in behaviour of citizens. Rather, German ingenuity would have to do the trick. 鈥淲e will have to ensure that mobility in the world is guaranteed聽through technology,鈥� said N眉脽lein.
